On Sat, 30 Jun 2018, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:45:54 +0200
Nikolaus Voss wrote:
I2C device ID table strings should really match the DT compatible
strings (without the manufacturer prefix) to avoid confusion. This is
especially reasonable when using ACPI PRP0001 HID /DT co
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:45:54 +0200
Nikolaus Voss wrote:
> I2C device ID table strings should really match the DT compatible
> strings (without the manufacturer prefix) to avoid confusion. This is
> especially reasonable when using ACPI PRP0001 HID /DT compatibility
> entries along with the DT com
I2C device ID table strings should really match the DT compatible
strings (without the manufacturer prefix) to avoid confusion. This is
especially reasonable when using ACPI PRP0001 HID /DT compatibility
entries along with the DT compatible property in DSD which is
used as a modalias (with manufact
3 matches
Mail list logo