On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> and I am now at :
> 464 WARNING: line over 80 characters
> 90 WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see
> Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt
>
> Many "volatile" warnings are about such definitions :
>
> #define
Date: mer. 05/09/2012 11:14
À: Greg Ungerer
Cc: Stany MARCEL; linux-m...@lists.linux-m68k.org; ge...@linux-m68k.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Objet : Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver
Hi Stany & Greg
Seeing that I was not the only one wanting to have the m54xx fec dma
Hi Stany & Greg
Seeing that I was not the only one wanting to have the m54xx fec dma
driver merged in, and hoping to compare Stany's version to mine,
I have rebased (step by step) my patch from v2.38 to v3.6rc2.
The driver still works and perhaps even better due to some fixes
in other m68k area.
Hi Stany,
I haven't looked over it in detail, but a few little things anyway.
On 21/08/12 22:18, Stany MARCEL wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL
---
This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel 2.6.25.
Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m
Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL
---
This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel 2.6.25.
Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m68k head
2 FEC configured with shared phy
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/Kconfig | 27 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/fre
5 matches
Mail list logo