Hello,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Can you please drop 21 and 22? Everything else shouldn't be affected
>> and we can sort these out later. The actual deprecation patch is held
>> off for now anyway.
>
> hm, I could. Instead I merged your patch on top of Tomas's and
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:27:55 -0800
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Andrew.
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:24:22PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > This gets all tangled up with
> > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/block-fix-ext_devt_idr-handling.patch,
> > which appears to solve the same issue.
Hello, Andrew.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:24:22PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This gets all tangled up with
> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/block-fix-ext_devt_idr-handling.patch,
> which appears to solve the same issue.
>
> What to do?
Can you please drop 21 and 22? Everything else
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:39:53 -0800
Tejun Heo wrote:
> idr allocation in blk_alloc_devt() wasn't synchronized against lookup
> and removal, and its limit check was off by one - 1 << MINORBITS is
> the number of minors allowed, not the maximum allowed minor.
>
> Add locking and rename MAX_EXT_DEVT
idr allocation in blk_alloc_devt() wasn't synchronized against lookup
and removal, and its limit check was off by one - 1 << MINORBITS is
the number of minors allowed, not the maximum allowed minor.
Add locking and rename MAX_EXT_DEVT to NR_EXT_DEVT and fix limit
checking.
Signed-off-by: Tejun He
5 matches
Mail list logo
