Hi Olga,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:36:06PM +, Kornievskaia, Olga wrote:
>
> Hi Willy,
>
> After checking with the list, I believe the course of action will be to
> correct the patch with the patch below instead of reverting it.
OK but as far as I can tell, mainline is still not fixed regar
Hi Olga,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:54:34PM +, Kornievskaia, Olga wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> I believe the patch introduced another problem and needs to be corrected.
Can you be more specific ? What problem, or how to verify which one ?
Should the patch simply be reverted ?
Thanks,
Willy
--
T
Hi Willy,
I believe the patch introduced another problem and needs to be corrected.
> On Sep 12, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> know.
>
> --
>
> From: Olga Kornievskaia
>
> commit e8d9
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Olga Kornievskaia
commit e8d975e73e5fa05f983fbf2723120edcf68e0b38 upstream.
Problem: When an operation like WRITE receives a BAD_STATEID, even though
recovery code clears the RECLAIM_NOGRA
4 matches
Mail list logo