Roland,
We'll work on upgrading you to T3B2 boards as well.
Stay tuned.
Steve.
Divy Le Ray wrote:
Roland Dreier wrote:
Looks OK to me but I would just roll up the second patch into the
first patch and let Jeff merge it as one commit. There's no point in
creating an intermediate tree that
Roland Dreier wrote:
Looks OK to me but I would just roll up the second patch into the
first patch and let Jeff merge it as one commit. There's no point in
creating an intermediate tree that doesn't build -- it just breaks git
bisect for no useful purpose.
Okay, Jeff agrees too, I'll do so.
Roland Dreier wrote:
Looks OK to me but I would just roll up the second patch into the
first patch and let Jeff merge it as one commit. There's no point in
creating an intermediate tree that doesn't build -- it just breaks git
bisect for no useful purpose.
Agreed -- this needs to be in a singl
Looks OK to me but I would just roll up the second patch into the
first patch and let Jeff merge it as one commit. There's no point in
creating an intermediate tree that doesn't build -- it just breaks git
bisect for no useful purpose.
Also as a side note, when trying to test this I got the messa
Jeff/Roland,
I'm resubmitting the cxgb3 dev->priv fix for inclusion in 2.6.23.
I also submit a follow-up patch for the iw_cxgb3 driver that fixes
the previous infiniband breakage.
Cheers,
Divy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [
5 matches
Mail list logo
