RE: [PATCH 2/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: use bits_per_word_mask

2013-07-01 Thread H Hartley Sweeten
On Monday, July 01, 2013 11:23 AM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Sunday, June 30, 2013 9:14 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> Please use SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(4, 16) here. > > I thought there was a macro for this, just couldn't find it. I'll fix this. Doh... This patch is already in linux-next. I'll nee

RE: [PATCH 2/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: use bits_per_word_mask

2013-07-01 Thread H Hartley Sweeten
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 9:14 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:43:07AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> This driver supports 16 to 4 bits per work. Set the bits_per_word_mask >> to allows the spi core to handle validation. >> >> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten >> Cc: Rya

Re: [PATCH 2/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: use bits_per_word_mask

2013-06-30 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:43:07AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > This driver supports 16 to 4 bits per work. Set the bits_per_word_mask > to allows the spi core to handle validation. > > Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten > Cc: Ryan Mallon > Cc: Mika Westerberg > Cc: Mark Brown > Cc: Grant L

[PATCH 2/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: use bits_per_word_mask

2013-06-28 Thread H Hartley Sweeten
This driver supports 16 to 4 bits per work. Set the bits_per_word_mask to allows the spi core to handle validation. Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten Cc: Ryan Mallon Cc: Mika Westerberg Cc: Mark Brown Cc: Grant Likely --- drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 11 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(