een N. Rao"
To: "Chen, Gong"
Cc: tony.l...@intel.com, b...@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ACPI, CPER: Update cper info
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On 2013/10/11 02:32AM, Chen Gong wrote:
To satisfy the ne
rnel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ACPI, CPER: Update cper info
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On 2013/10/11 02:32AM, Chen Gong wrote:
To satisfy the necessary of following patches and make related definition
more clear, update some definitions about CPER. No functional changes.
Signe
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ACPI, CPER: Update cper info
> > X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1
> >
> > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 17:47 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:06:30AM +02
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:57:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:57:18 -0700
> From: Joe Perches
> To: Borislav Petkov
> Cc: "Chen, Gong" , tony.l...@intel.com,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 17:47 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:06:30AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > - printk("%s""APEI generic hardware error status\n", pfx);
> > > + printk("%s""Generic Hardware Error Status\n", pfx);
> >
> > Btw, what's the story with printk not us
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:47:23PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:47:23 +0530
> From: "Naveen N. Rao"
> To: "Chen, Gong"
> Cc: tony.l...@intel.com, b...@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> Subje
On 2013/10/11 02:32AM, Chen Gong wrote:
> To satisfy the necessary of following patches and make related definition
> more clear, update some definitions about CPER. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h | 12 -
> drivers/acpi/apei
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:06:30AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > - printk("%s""APEI generic hardware error status\n", pfx);
> > + printk("%s""Generic Hardware Error Status\n", pfx);
>
> Btw, what's the story with printk not using KERN_x levels in this file?
> Why are we falling back to def
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:32:40AM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote:
> To satisfy the necessary of following patches and make related definition
"To prepare for the following patches... " you mean?
> more clear, update some definitions about CPER. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong
> -
To satisfy the necessary of following patches and make related definition
more clear, update some definitions about CPER. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong
---
drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h | 12 -
drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c | 46
10 matches
Mail list logo
