On Mon, 27 Jun, at 12:49:20PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The other weirdness is the misalignment of the '0xe' portion here:
>
> #define LINUX_EFI_ARM_SCREEN_INFO_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0xe03fc20a, 0x85dc,
> 0x406e, 0xb9, 0xe, 0x4a, 0xb5, 0x02, 0x37, 0x1d, 0x95)
> #define LINUX_EFI_LOADER_ENTRY_GUID
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 12:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Matt Fleming wrote:
[]
> > + * EFI Configuration Table and GUID definitions
> > + *
> > + * These should be formatted roughly like the ones in the UEFI SPEC has
> > + * them. It makes them easier to grep for, and they look the same when
>
* Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Peter Jones
>
> Add a comment documenting why EFI GUIDs are laid out like they are.
> Ideally I'd like to change all the ", " to "," too, but right now the
> format is such that checkpatch won't complain with new ones, and staring
> at checkpatch didn't get me any
From: Peter Jones
Add a comment documenting why EFI GUIDs are laid out like they are.
Ideally I'd like to change all the ", " to "," too, but right now the
format is such that checkpatch won't complain with new ones, and staring
at checkpatch didn't get me anywhere towards making that work.
Sign
4 matches
Mail list logo
