Re: [PATCH 2/6] samples: refactor Makefile

2014-07-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sam, On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:52:36 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:25:33PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 07/13/14 11:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > Use one line per module/program in Makefile. > > > This style is easier to read/extend. > > > > > > Introduce inverse

Re: [PATCH 2/6] samples: refactor Makefile

2014-07-13 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 07/13/14 12:52, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Randy - thanks for the feedback. > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:25:33PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 07/13/14 11:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >>> Use one line per module/program in Makefile. >>> This style is easier to read/extend. >>> >>> Introduce inver

Re: [PATCH 2/6] samples: refactor Makefile

2014-07-13 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Randy - thanks for the feedback. On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:25:33PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/13/14 11:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Use one line per module/program in Makefile. > > This style is easier to read/extend. > > > > Introduce inverse xmas style sorting. > > google search cou

Re: [PATCH 2/6] samples: refactor Makefile

2014-07-13 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 07/13/14 11:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Use one line per module/program in Makefile. > This style is easier to read/extend. > > Introduce inverse xmas style sorting. google search couldn't tell me what that means and I cannot deduce it from the new Makefile ordering (if there is some ordering).

[PATCH 2/6] samples: refactor Makefile

2014-07-13 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Use one line per module/program in Makefile. This style is easier to read/extend. Introduce inverse xmas style sorting. This may prevent some merge conflicts in the future Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg --- samples/Makefile | 15 +-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) di