On Thu, 05 Jul 2018, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:12:36 +0200 Manfred Spraul
wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On 07/05/2018 10:36 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> [...]
> Hi Manfred,
>
> The series looks like a significant improvement to me. Thanks!
>
> I feel that this code can be further simplif
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:12:36 +0200 Manfred Spraul
wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On 07/05/2018 10:36 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > [...]
> > Hi Manfred,
> >
> > The series looks like a significant improvement to me. Thanks!
> >
> > I feel that this code can be further simplified (unless I am missing
> >
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On 07/05/2018 10:36 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> Hi Manfred,
>>
>> The series looks like a significant improvement to me. Thanks!
>>
>> I feel that this code can be further simplified (unless I am missing
>> somethin
Hi Dmitry,
On 07/05/2018 10:36 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
[...]
Hi Manfred,
The series looks like a significant improvement to me. Thanks!
I feel that this code can be further simplified (unless I am missing
something here). Please take a look at this version:
https://github.com/dvyukov/linux/c
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> ipc_addid() initializes kern_ipc_perm.seq after having called
> ipc_idr_alloc().
>
> Thus a parallel semop() or msgrcv() that uses ipc_obtain_object_check()
> may see an uninitialized value.
>
> The patch moves the initialization of kern_ipc_
ipc_addid() initializes kern_ipc_perm.seq after having called
ipc_idr_alloc().
Thus a parallel semop() or msgrcv() that uses ipc_obtain_object_check()
may see an uninitialized value.
The patch moves the initialization of kern_ipc_perm.seq before the
calls of ipc_idr_alloc().
Notes:
1) This patch
6 matches
Mail list logo