On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 00:30 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:23:08AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 07:07:49PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> > > Al pointed out on IRC that vfree should be callable under spinlock.
> >
> > Al had been near-terminally low on ca
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:23:08AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 07:07:49PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > Al pointed out on IRC that vfree should be callable under spinlock.
>
> Al had been near-terminally low on caffeine at the time, posted
> a retraction a few minutes later
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 07:07:49PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Al pointed out on IRC that vfree should be callable under spinlock.
Al had been near-terminally low on caffeine at the time, posted
a retraction a few minutes later and went to grab some coffee...
> It
> only sleeps if !in_interrupt(
On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 15:32 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Calling ceph_buffer_put() in __ceph_setxattr() may end up freeing the
> i_xattrs.prealloc_blob buffer while holding the i_ceph_lock. This can be
> fixed by postponing the call until later, when the lock is released.
>
> The following back
Calling ceph_buffer_put() in __ceph_setxattr() may end up freeing the
i_xattrs.prealloc_blob buffer while holding the i_ceph_lock. This can be
fixed by postponing the call until later, when the lock is released.
The following backtrace was triggered by fstests generic/117.
BUG: sleeping functi
5 matches
Mail list logo
