Namjae Jeon writes:
>> You have to think about compatibility with other FAT, not unix fs.
>
> Agreed, ctime is creation time, and there are comptability issues with
> the patch.
>
> But there is confusion about 'ctime' usage in the default code. When
> referring the code I found many instances ex
2012/11/15, OGAWA Hirofumi :
> Namjae Jeon writes:
>
>> 1)If we consider the code for FAT and MSDOS to be same with respect to
>> timing updates - there there is difference in code as mentioned below:
>> a) For:vfat_rmdir()
>> inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
>>For:msdo
Namjae Jeon writes:
> 1)If we consider the code for FAT and MSDOS to be same with respect to
> timing updates - there there is difference in code as mentioned below:
> a) For:vfat_rmdir()
> inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
>For:msdos_rmdir()
> inode->i_c
2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi :
> OGAWA Hirofumi writes:
>
>> Namjae Jeon writes:
>>
> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS?
>>> Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with
>>> specifical test reseult with other filesystem.
BTW, I recall I checked thi
OGAWA Hirofumi writes:
> Namjae Jeon writes:
>
What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS?
>> Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with
>> specifical test reseult with other filesystem.
>>>
>>> BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is hi
Namjae Jeon writes:
>>> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS?
> Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with
> specifical test reseult with other filesystem.
>>
>> BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical.
> "historical" means It
2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi :
> OGAWA Hirofumi writes:
>
>> Namjae Jeon writes:
>>
>>> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi :
Namjae Jeon writes:
> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of
> file/directory removal and creation.
This changelog just explain
OGAWA Hirofumi writes:
> Namjae Jeon writes:
>
>> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi :
>>> Namjae Jeon writes:
>>>
Correctly update modification and status change time in case of
file/directory removal and creation.
>>>
>>> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Ple
Namjae Jeon writes:
> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi :
>> Namjae Jeon writes:
>>
>>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of
>>> file/directory removal and creation.
>>
>> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Please
>> explain why we need this cha
2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi :
> Namjae Jeon writes:
>
>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of
>> file/directory removal and creation.
>
> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Please
> explain why we need this change.
>
> IIRC, timestamp handli
Namjae Jeon writes:
> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of
> file/directory removal and creation.
This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Please
explain why we need this change.
IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically.
Correctly update modification and status change time in case of
file/directory removal and creation.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon
Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat
---
fs/fat/dir.c|2 +-
fs/fat/namei_vfat.c |6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fa
12 matches
Mail list logo
