RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] dma-fence: use default wait function for mock fences

2020-05-11 Thread Ruhl, Michael J
nux- >me...@vger.kernel.org >Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] dma-fence: use default wait function for >mock fences > >>-Original Message- >>From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of >>Daniel Vetter >>Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 5:12 AM >>To: LKML >

RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] dma-fence: use default wait function for mock fences

2020-05-11 Thread Ruhl, Michael J
; Sumit Semwal ; linux- >me...@vger.kernel.org >Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] dma-fence: use default wait function for >mock fences > >No need to micro-optmize when we're waiting in a mocked object ... Makes sense to me. Acked-by: Michael J. Ruhl M >Signed-off-b

Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma-fence: use default wait function for mock fences

2020-05-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Daniel Vetter (2020-05-11 10:11:41) > > No need to micro-optmize when we're waiting in a mocked object ... > > It's setting up the expected return values for the test. Drat, I suspect something like that but didn't spot it. K

Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma-fence: use default wait function for mock fences

2020-05-11 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2020-05-11 10:11:41) > No need to micro-optmize when we're waiting in a mocked object ... It's setting up the expected return values for the test. -Chris

[PATCH 2/3] dma-fence: use default wait function for mock fences

2020-05-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
No need to micro-optmize when we're waiting in a mocked object ... Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Sumit Semwal Cc: linux-me...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org --- drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c | 41 -- 1 file changed, 41 deletions(-) diff -