On 2014/6/5 9:20, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:59:59PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> The example I gave is the same result if sane_behavior is not specified,
>> so this is a behavioural change for the old interface?
>
> Hmmm? Either the userland knows about unified hierar
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:59:59PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> The example I gave is the same result if sane_behavior is not specified,
> so this is a behavioural change for the old interface?
Hmmm? Either the userland knows about unified hierarchy or not and
there's no point in hiding it if
On 2014/6/3 21:01, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:05:22PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Before this patch (in a fresh system):
>>
>># cat /proc/$$/cgroup
>># mount -t cgroup -o __DEVEL__sane_behavior xxx /cgroup
>># umount /cgroup
>># cat /proc/$$/cgroup
>>
>> 0:cpuse
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:05:22PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Before this patch (in a fresh system):
>
># cat /proc/$$/cgroup
># mount -t cgroup -o __DEVEL__sane_behavior xxx /cgroup
># umount /cgroup
># cat /proc/$$/cgroup
>
> 0:cpuset,cpu,cpuacct,memory,devices,freezer,net_cls,
Before this patch (in a fresh system):
# cat /proc/$$/cgroup
# mount -t cgroup -o __DEVEL__sane_behavior xxx /cgroup
# umount /cgroup
# cat /proc/$$/cgroup
0:cpuset,cpu,cpuacct,memory,devices,freezer,net_cls,blkio,perf_event,net_prio,hugetlb:/
After this patch (in a fresh system):
5 matches
Mail list logo