On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:32:40AM +0100, Quentin Lambert wrote:
>
>
> On 12/03/2015 10:27, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:37:30PM +0200, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> >>It's still not in staging-testing for some reason :(
> >>
> >It can take several weeks to get merged. Rel
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:32:40AM +0100, Quentin Lambert wrote:
> Should I wait these several weeks to send the second version or should
> I send a second version fixing this issue a wait for someone to ask me
> to solve the conflict ?
Greg applies patches in the order they come. It's normally s
On 12/03/2015 10:27, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:37:30PM +0200, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
It's still not in staging-testing for some reason :(
It can take several weeks to get merged. Relax.
regards,
dan carpenter
What should i do concerning that ?
I need to send a
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:37:30PM +0200, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> It's still not in staging-testing for some reason :(
>
It can take several weeks to get merged. Relax.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a mes
On 2015.03.11 16:04, Quentin Lambert wrote:
> This patch introduces goto statments for error handling
> and in cases where a lock needs to be released.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr)
>
> @candidates exists@
> ide
This patch introduces goto statments for error handling
and in cases where a lock needs to be released.
A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr)
@candidates exists@
identifier f, label;
statement s;
position p1, p2, p3;
@@
f@
6 matches
Mail list logo
