On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:04:45 +
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:48:02AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> > the mkubootimg tool.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:48:02AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> the mkubootimg tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From the point of view of no overall change: Ack.
>From the point of view of whether
(removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] from Cc since it's misspelled. Thanks, Paul)
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:48:02 -0600
Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> the mkubootimg tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A
Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
the mkubootimg tool.
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/arm/boot/Makefile |4 ++--
arch/avr32/boot/images/Makefile |4 ++--
arch/blackfin/boot/Makefile |4 ++--
arch/ppc/boot/i
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:19:28AM +, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:01:19PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:58:54PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:41:40 +
> > > Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 0
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:01:19PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:58:54PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:41:40 +
> > Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:04:06PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > Rework the architec
On Jan 4, 2008 6:58 AM, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:41:40 +
> Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:04:06PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> > > the mkubo
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:58:54PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:41:40 +
> Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:04:06PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> > > the mkuboo
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:41:40 +
Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:04:06PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> > the mkubootimg tool.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> A
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:04:06PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> the mkubootimg tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A CC: to RMK and any other arch maintainers being touched by this
would have useful too
Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
the mkubootimg tool.
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/arm/boot/Makefile |4 ++--
arch/avr32/boot/images/Makefile |4 ++--
arch/blackfin/boot/Makefile |4 ++--
arch/ppc/boot/i
11 matches
Mail list logo