Hi Peter,
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:35:11AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:26:13PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> >
>> >> Apologies, I meant (without
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:35:11AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:26:13PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >
> >> Apologies, I meant (without the "off"):
> >>
> >> subsystem: atomic_section
> >> events:
> >> irqs
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:26:13PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>> Apologies, I meant (without the "off"):
>>
>> subsystem: atomic_section
>> events:
>> irqs_disable
>> irqs_enable
>> preempt_disable
>> preempt_enable
>>
>> and add
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:26:13PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Apologies, I meant (without the "off"):
>
> subsystem: atomic_section
> events:
> irqs_disable
> irqs_enable
> preempt_disable
> preempt_enable
>
> and additionally (similar to what my patch does):
> preemptirq_enable
>
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 21:44:26 +0200
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>>> > I can change the name to something else, but at the moment I can't
>>> > think of anything better. Could you sugges
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 21:44:26 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> > I can change the name to something else, but at the moment I can't
>> > think of anything better. Could you suggest a better name? Also btw,
>> > 'critical timings' is the term
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 21:44:26 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I can change the name to something else, but at the moment I can't
> > think of anything better. Could you suggest a better name? Also btw,
> > 'critical timings' is the terminology used within the irqsoff tracer
> > so this is in line w
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:04:44PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 01:50:51AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >> Critical section trace events can be used for tracing the start and
> >> end of a critica
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 01:50:51AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> Critical section trace events can be used for tracing the start and
>> end of a critical section which can be used by a trace viewer like
>> systrace to graphicall
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 01:50:51AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Critical section trace events can be used for tracing the start and
> end of a critical section which can be used by a trace viewer like
> systrace to graphically view the start and end of a critical section and
> correlate them with
Critical section trace events can be used for tracing the start and
end of a critical section which can be used by a trace viewer like
systrace to graphically view the start and end of a critical section and
correlate them with latencies and scheduling issues.
Reason for starting critical section:
11 matches
Mail list logo