m;
> srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org; rander.w...@linux.intel.com;
> ranjani.sridha...@linux.intel.com; hui.w...@canonical.com; pierre-
> louis.boss...@linux.intel.com; Kale, Sanyog R ;
> Blauciak, Slawomir ; Lin, Mengdong
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soundwire: intel: transition to 3 steps
Mengdong
> > ; Liao, Bard
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soundwire: intel: transition to 3 steps
> > initialization
> >
> > On 20-05-20, 03:19, Bard Liao wrote:
> > > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart
> > >
> > > Rather than a plain-vanilla init/exit
@linaro.org; rander.w...@linux.intel.com;
> ranjani.sridha...@linux.intel.com; hui.w...@canonical.com; pierre-
> louis.boss...@linux.intel.com; Kale, Sanyog R ;
> Blauciak, Slawomir ; Lin, Mengdong
> ; Liao, Bard
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soundwire: intel: transition to 3 steps
>
On 20-05-20, 03:19, Bard Liao wrote:
> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart
>
> Rather than a plain-vanilla init/exit, this patch provides 3 steps in
> the initialization (ACPI scan, probe, startup) which makes it easier to
> detect platform support for SoundWire, allocate required resources as
> early as
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart
Rather than a plain-vanilla init/exit, this patch provides 3 steps in
the initialization (ACPI scan, probe, startup) which makes it easier to
detect platform support for SoundWire, allocate required resources as
early as possible, and conversely help make the startup()
5 matches
Mail list logo