Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Add fixed memory region support

2016-08-31 Thread Suman Anna
On 08/31/2016 11:37 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue 30 Aug 16:13 PDT 2016, Suman Anna wrote: > > +if (rsc->vring[i].da != 0 && rsc->vring[i].da != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY) { > [..] @Suman, do you have any input on this? >> > > Thanks Suman > >> I was thinking about this as well, and the

Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Add fixed memory region support

2016-08-31 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Tue 30 Aug 16:13 PDT 2016, Suman Anna wrote: > >>> +if (rsc->vring[i].da != 0 && rsc->vring[i].da != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY) { [..] > >> @Suman, do you have any input on this? > Thanks Suman > I was thinking about this as well, and the way I actually envisioned > this is to add additional rproc

Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Add fixed memory region support

2016-08-31 Thread loic pallardy
On 08/31/2016 01:13 AM, Suman Anna wrote: Hi Suman, Hi Loic, Bjorn, On 08/29/2016 03:09 AM, loic pallardy wrote: On 08/27/2016 02:32 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Fri 26 Aug 13:19 PDT 2016, Loic Pallardy wrote: Some coprocessors request fixed memory mapping for firmware execution and

Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Add fixed memory region support

2016-08-30 Thread Suman Anna
Hi Loic, Bjorn, On 08/29/2016 03:09 AM, loic pallardy wrote: > > > On 08/27/2016 02:32 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >> On Fri 26 Aug 13:19 PDT 2016, Loic Pallardy wrote: >> >>> Some coprocessors request fixed memory mapping for firmware execution >>> and associated communication linked. >>> Memory

Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Add fixed memory region support

2016-08-29 Thread loic pallardy
On 08/27/2016 02:32 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Fri 26 Aug 13:19 PDT 2016, Loic Pallardy wrote: Some coprocessors request fixed memory mapping for firmware execution and associated communication linked. Memory resources are defined in firmware resource table. Resource address different from

Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Add fixed memory region support

2016-08-26 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Fri 26 Aug 13:19 PDT 2016, Loic Pallardy wrote: > Some coprocessors request fixed memory mapping for firmware execution > and associated communication linked. > Memory resources are defined in firmware resource table. > Resource address different from 0x0 and 0x is considered as predefi

[PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Add fixed memory region support

2016-08-26 Thread Loic Pallardy
Some coprocessors request fixed memory mapping for firmware execution and associated communication linked. Memory resources are defined in firmware resource table. Resource address different from 0x0 and 0x is considered as predefined and already reserved at system level. In that case, remo