Gautham R Shenoy writes:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:22:07PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 16:47 +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
>> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>> >
>> > Each of the SMT4 cores forming a fused-core are more or less
>> > independent units. Thus when mult
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:22:07PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 16:47 +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
> >
> > Each of the SMT4 cores forming a fused-core are more or less
> > independent units. Thus when multiple tasks are scheduled to run on
On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 16:47 +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>
> Each of the SMT4 cores forming a fused-core are more or less
> independent units. Thus when multiple tasks are scheduled to run on
> the fused core, we get the best performance when the tasks are spread
>
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
Each of the SMT4 cores forming a fused-core are more or less
independent units. Thus when multiple tasks are scheduled to run on
the fused core, we get the best performance when the tasks are spread
across the pair of SMT4 cores.
Since the threads in the pair of SMT4 co
4 matches
Mail list logo
