On Sat, 11 Nov 2017, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Fix child-node lookup during probe, which ended up searching the whole
> device tree depth-first starting at the parent rather than just matching
> on its children.
>
> To make things worse, the parent node was prematurely freed, while the
> child node w
On 11/11/2017 05:38 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Fix child-node lookup during probe, which ended up searching the whole
> device tree depth-first starting at the parent rather than just matching
> on its children.
>
> To make things worse, the parent node was prematurely freed, while the
> child node
On Sat, 11 Nov 2017, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Fix child-node lookup during probe, which ended up searching the whole
> device tree depth-first starting at the parent rather than just matching
> on its children.
>
> To make things worse, the parent node was prematurely freed, while the
> child node w
Fix child-node lookup during probe, which ended up searching the whole
device tree depth-first starting at the parent rather than just matching
on its children.
To make things worse, the parent node was prematurely freed, while the
child node was leaked.
Note that the CONFIG_OF compile guard can
4 matches
Mail list logo
