>
> At some point everyone needs to standardize on power levels so that
> userland has a hope of mapping the right state to the right power level
> in the driver. Otherwise, we get into a situation where broadcom power
> levels don't map the same way iwl powerlevels do, and then we can't ever
> do
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 19:11 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 6:18 PM, Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday 17 November 2007 07:15:05 Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > Why power management shouldn't be enabled while in AC? The semantic of
> > > this
> > > ioctls is quit
On Nov 26, 2007 6:18 PM, Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 17 November 2007 07:15:05 Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > Why power management shouldn't be enabled while in AC? The semantic of this
> > ioctls is quite unclear.
>
I
> IWL_POWER_AC and IWL_POWER_BATTERY are just two power mo
On Saturday 17 November 2007 07:15:05 Tomas Winkler wrote:
> Why power management shouldn't be enabled while in AC? The semantic of this
> ioctls is quite unclear.
IWL_POWER_AC and IWL_POWER_BATTERY are just two power modes. IWL_POWER_AC
would be the default power mode when we're in AC (no power
This patch adds power management support in iwl3945 and iwl4965 drivers.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
index 9baf8de..5c7b422 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945
5 matches
Mail list logo
