On 6/14/2018 4:48 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Keerthy wrote:
I think the idea is to make it possible to use GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
for banked IRQs but the infrastructure is not yet inside the gpiolib
so it is a bit taped on the side right now.
Okay. I will take a l
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> I think the idea is to make it possible to use GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
>> for banked IRQs but the infrastructure is not yet inside the gpiolib
>> so it is a bit taped on the side right now.
>
> Okay. I will take a look at that. The key issue that this p
On Thursday 14 June 2018 01:59 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>> Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
>> and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
>> instead call platform_get_irq for all th
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
> and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
> instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
> in an array for later use.
>
> Signe
On 06/06/2018 04:18 AM, Keerthy wrote:
Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
in an array for later use.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
in an array for later use.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
Tested for GPIO Interrupts on da850-l
6 matches
Mail list logo
