On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 21:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:18:49 +0200 Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
> > into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0x instead and
> > convert
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > b) what happens when an old ext2 driver tries to read and/or write this
> >directory entry? Do we need a compat flag for it?
>
> Old ext2 only supports up
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> b) what happens when an old ext2 driver tries to read and/or write this
>directory entry? Do we need a compat flag for it?
Old ext2 only supports up to 4k
include/linux/ext2_fs.h:
#define EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE 1024
#define EXT2_MAX_BLOC
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:18:49 +0200 Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
> into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0x instead and convert
> value when read from / written to disk.
btw, this changes ext2's
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:18:49 +0200 Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +static inline __le16 ext2_rec_len_to_disk(unsigned len)
> +{
> + if (len == (1 << 16))
> + return cpu_to_le16(EXT2_MAX_REC_LEN);
> + else if (len > (1 << 16))
> + BUG();
> + return cpu_to_
On Thu 04-10-07 13:12:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
> >
> > From: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:30:03 +0200 Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu 04-10-07 16:11:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:40:44 -0600
> > Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Oct 04, 2007 13:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:3
On Thu 04-10-07 16:11:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:40:44 -0600
> Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 04, 2007 13:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
> > > > ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
> > > >
> > >
On Thu 04-10-07 13:12:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
> >
> > From: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:40:44 -0600
Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 04, 2007 13:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
> > > ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
> > >
> > > into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0x ins
On Oct 04, 2007 13:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
> > ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
> >
> > into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0x instead and
> > convert value when read from / written to disk.
>
> This patch clashes in
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
>
> From: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
> into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we st
ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
From: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0x instead and convert
value when read from / written to disk.
Signed-off-by: J
13 matches
Mail list logo
