On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> >> Is this a regression? This must have worked at one time, but it seems
>> >> like we've had pnpacpi_init/isapnp_init/pnpbios_init before PCI
>> >> drivers for quite a while.
>> >
>> >
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> >> Is this a regression? This must have worked at one time, but it seems
> >> like we've had pnpacpi_init/isapnp_init/pnpbios_init before PCI
> >> drivers for quite a while.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Do you know when the regression occurred? If you
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Rafael, just FYI since it involves PNP resources]
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> Mathhew reported kernels fail the pci_eisa probe and are later succes
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Rafael, just FYI since it involves PNP resources]
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Mathhew reported kernels fail the pci_eisa probe and are later successful
>> with the virtual_eisa_root_init force probe withou
[+cc Rafael, just FYI since it involves PNP resources]
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Mathhew reported kernels fail the pci_eisa probe and are later successful
> with the virtual_eisa_root_init force probe without slot0.
>
> The reason for that is: pnp probing is early than
Mathhew reported kernels fail the pci_eisa probe and are later successful
with the virtual_eisa_root_init force probe without slot0.
The reason for that is: pnp probing is early than pci_eisa_init get called
as pci_eisa_init is called via pci_driver.
pnp 00:0f has 0xc80 - 0xc84 reserved.
[9.7
6 matches
Mail list logo