On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 15:12 +1000, Ian Munsie wrote:
> Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-08-19 14:49:30 +1000:
> > Do we really need the accessors? They don't buy anything I can see over just
> > using ctx->priv directly.
>
> The reasoning there is because we don't currently expose
Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-08-19 14:49:30 +1000:
> Do we really need the accessors? They don't buy anything I can see over just
> using ctx->priv directly.
The reasoning there is because we don't currently expose the contents of
stuct cxl_context to afu drivers, rather they j
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 14:19 +1000, Ian Munsie wrote:
> From: Michael Neuling
>
> This provides AFU drivers a means to associate private data with a cxl
> context. This is particularly intended for make the new callbacks for
> driver specific events easier for AFU drivers to use, as they can easil
From: Michael Neuling
This provides AFU drivers a means to associate private data with a cxl
context. This is particularly intended for make the new callbacks for
driver specific events easier for AFU drivers to use, as they can easily
get back to any private data structures they may use.
Signed
4 matches
Mail list logo
