On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 12:34:38PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> For reasons totally beyond my understanding, gcc 8 changed the
> order of two structure member, which leads to an error:
I'm a little late on this, but isn't the whole point of C99 initializers
that field order should not m
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 12:34:38PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> For reasons totally beyond my understanding, gcc 8 changed the
>> order of two structure member, which leads to an error:
>
> I'm a little late on this, but isn't
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:34 AM, wrote:
> For reasons totally beyond my understanding, gcc 8 changed the
> order of two structure member, which leads to an error:
>
> HOSTCXX -fPIC scripts/gcc-plugins/latent_entropy_plugin.o
> scripts/gcc-plugins/latent_entropy_plugin.c:269:1: error: designator
For reasons totally beyond my understanding, gcc 8 changed the
order of two structure member, which leads to an error:
HOSTCXX -fPIC scripts/gcc-plugins/latent_entropy_plugin.o
scripts/gcc-plugins/latent_entropy_plugin.c:269:1: error: designator order for
field 'attribute_spec::affects_type_ide
4 matches
Mail list logo