Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-09-18 Thread Tomasz Figa
On 18.09.2014 21:29, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:16 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: >> On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:58 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>> I had two patches fixing those, but apparently this was lost in action. >>> The correct solution is s/PLAT_S5P/ARCH_S5PV210/. I will include thi

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:16 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:58 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > I had two patches fixing those, but apparently this was lost in action. > > The correct solution is s/PLAT_S5P/ARCH_S5PV210/. I will include this in > > a follow-up series if nobody obje

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-09-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 04 September 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 15:00 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On 16.07.2014 12:24, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > >> -config S5P_GPIO_DRVSTR > > >> - bool > > >> - help > > >> -Internal configura

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-09-04 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:58 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 16.07.2014 12:15, Paul Bolle wrote: > > After this patch that symbol is still referenced in: > > drivers/media/platform/Kconfig:159: depends on VIDEO_DEV && VIDEO_V4L2 > > && (PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS) > > drivers/media/platform/Kconfig

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-09-04 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 15:00 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 16.07.2014 12:24, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> -config S5P_GPIO_DRVSTR > >> - bool > >> - help > >> -Internal configuration to get and set correct GPIO driver strength > >> -help

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-17 Thread Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 12:10 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > The strange thing is that it is dated "Jun 3 2104". 2014 That must be my most common typo! Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-17 Thread Paul Bolle
Tomasz, On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:56 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 16.07.2014 11:47, Paul Bolle wrote: > > So a second order effect is that SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA can now be removed. > > Which implies that SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA64 and SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA128 can > > also be removed. > > > > Should I submi

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-16 Thread Tomasz Figa
On 16.07.2014 12:24, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: [snip] >> -config S5P_GPIO_DRVSTR >> -bool >> -help >> - Internal configuration to get and set correct GPIO driver strength >> - helper >> - > > This one is used (as a macro) in drive

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-16 Thread Tomasz Figa
On 16.07.2014 12:15, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: [snip] >> -config PLAT_S5P >> -bool >> -depends on ARCH_S5PV210 >> -default y >> -select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB >> -select ARM_VIC >> -select NO_IOPORT_MAP >> -select PLAT_SAMS

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-16 Thread Tomasz Figa
On 16.07.2014 11:47, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: [snip] >> config SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA >> int "Number of additional GPIO pins" >> default 128 if SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA128 > > So a second order effect is that SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA can now be removed

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > After refactoring suspend/resume, which was last part with dependencies > on legacy code, all Kconfig symbols related to Samsung ATAGS support can > be deselected and more unused code removed. This includes most of s5p-* > code as well, as s5p

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > After refactoring suspend/resume, which was last part with dependencies > on legacy code, all Kconfig symbols related to Samsung ATAGS support can > be deselected and more unused code removed. This includes most of s5p-* > code as well, as s5p

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > After refactoring suspend/resume, which was last part with dependencies > on legacy code, all Kconfig symbols related to Samsung ATAGS support can > be deselected and more unused code removed. This includes most of s5p-* > code as well, as s5p

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-08 Thread Tomasz Figa
On 04.07.2014 22:23, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 04 July 2014 19:48:18 Tomasz Figa wrote: >> After refactoring suspend/resume, which was last part with dependencies >> on legacy code, all Kconfig symbols related to Samsung ATAGS support can >> be deselected and more unused code removed. This i

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 04 July 2014 19:48:18 Tomasz Figa wrote: > After refactoring suspend/resume, which was last part with dependencies > on legacy code, all Kconfig symbols related to Samsung ATAGS support can > be deselected and more unused code removed. This includes most of s5p-* > code as well, as s5pv21

[PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-04 Thread Tomasz Figa
After refactoring suspend/resume, which was last part with dependencies on legacy code, all Kconfig symbols related to Samsung ATAGS support can be deselected and more unused code removed. This includes most of s5p-* code as well, as s5pv210 was their last user. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa --- ar