On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:20:10 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>
> 2016-11-28 1:09 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> :
> &max_bitflips);
> >
> > Okay, so you currently have two ways of handling ECC errors. What if a
> > new revision introduces yet ano
Hi Boris,
2016-11-28 1:09 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
&max_bitflips);
>
> Okay, so you currently have two ways of handling ECC errors. What if a
> new revision introduces yet another way to do it?
>
> How about making denali_caps a structure where you have
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 03:06:03 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Some old versions of the Denali IP (perhaps used only for Intel?)
> detects ECC errors and provides correct data via a register, but
> does not touch the transferred data. So, the software must fixup
> the data in the buffer according t
Some old versions of the Denali IP (perhaps used only for Intel?)
detects ECC errors and provides correct data via a register, but
does not touch the transferred data. So, the software must fixup
the data in the buffer according to the provided ECC correction
information.
Newer versions perform E
4 matches
Mail list logo
