Re: [PATCH 17/20] x86_64: Remove CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 10:14:31AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > Sorry for not commenting on an earlier version. > > On 11/18/06, Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I am about to add relocatable kernel support which has essentially > >no cost so there is no point in retaining C

Re: [PATCH 17/20] x86_64: Remove CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START

Hi Vivek, Sorry for not commenting on an earlier version. On 11/18/06, Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am about to add relocatable kernel support which has essentially no cost so there is no point in retaining CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START and retaining CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START makes implementati

[PATCH 17/20] x86_64: Remove CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START

I am about to add relocatable kernel support which has essentially no cost so there is no point in retaining CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START and retaining CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START makes implementation of and testing of a relocatable kernel more difficult. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>