Re: [PATCH 16/16] warn-on-kthread-name-truncation.diff

2007-04-01 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Apr 1 2007 23:00, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:18:22 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >I'm not sure that it's a big enough problem to go adding code for, really. No, not really. If there are any kthread spawners that do exceed the limit, I would have pr

Re: [PATCH 16/16] warn-on-kthread-name-truncation.diff

2007-04-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:18:22 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton noted in http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/30/247 > > """We do occasionally hit task_struct.comm[] truncation, when people > use "too-long-a-name%d" for their kernel thread names.""" > > Thi

[PATCH 16/16] warn-on-kthread-name-truncation.diff

2007-04-01 Thread Jan Engelhardt
Andrew Morton noted in http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/30/247 """We do occasionally hit task_struct.comm[] truncation, when people use "too-long-a-name%d" for their kernel thread names.""" This patch warns when such a truncation happens. Already posted on http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7