Hey Andy,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 16:57 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
>> assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
>
> This one is a code maintena
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 16:57 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
> assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
This one is a code maintenance win. :)
See my comments at the end for the difference in assemble
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows:
3 matches
Mail list logo
