Re: [PATCH 15/16] use-regular-eth-suffix.diff

2007-04-01 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:18:12PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Some radio adapter drivers wrongly(?) name their devices "wlan%d" > instead of "eth%d" (if you ask me, it should be %u - but not today). > Technically, they operate like Ethernet, and in fact, running > `/sbin/ip a` shows "link/eth

Re: [PATCH 15/16] use-regular-eth-suffix.diff

2007-04-01 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Apr 01, 2007, at 14:18:12, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Some radio adapter drivers wrongly(?) name their devices "wlan%d" instead of "eth%d" (if you ask me, it should be %u - but not today). Technically, they operate like Ethernet, and in fact, running `/ sbin/ip a` shows "link/ether" instead of

[PATCH 15/16] use-regular-eth-suffix.diff

2007-04-01 Thread Jan Engelhardt
Some radio adapter drivers wrongly(?) name their devices "wlan%d" instead of "eth%d" (if you ask me, it should be %u - but not today). Technically, they operate like Ethernet, and in fact, running `/sbin/ip a` shows "link/ether" instead of "link/ieee80211". This patch renames them back, but I wou