Re: [PATCH 10/11] staging: lustre: move ldlm into ptlrpc

On Thu, Jun 07 2018, NeilBrown wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07 2018, James Simmons wrote: > >>> The ldlm code is built into the ptlrpc module, yet it lived in a >>> separate directory. This requires filename editing in the Makefile >>> and make it difficult to e.g. build the .s file for code in ldlm. >>>

Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 10/11] staging: lustre: move ldlm into ptlrpc

On Thu, Jun 07 2018, Ben Evans wrote: > On 6/7/18, 5:48 AM, "lustre-devel on behalf of NeilBrown" > wrote: > >>On Thu, Jun 07 2018, James Simmons wrote: >> The ldlm code is built into the ptlrpc module, yet it lived in a separate directory. This requires filename editing in the Makefil

Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 10/11] staging: lustre: move ldlm into ptlrpc

On 6/7/18, 5:48 AM, "lustre-devel on behalf of NeilBrown" wrote: >On Thu, Jun 07 2018, James Simmons wrote: > >>> The ldlm code is built into the ptlrpc module, yet it lived in a >>> separate directory. This requires filename editing in the Makefile >>> and make it difficult to e.g. build the

Re: [PATCH 10/11] staging: lustre: move ldlm into ptlrpc

On Thu, Jun 07 2018, James Simmons wrote: >> The ldlm code is built into the ptlrpc module, yet it lived in a >> separate directory. This requires filename editing in the Makefile >> and make it difficult to e.g. build the .s file for code in ldlm. >> >> All the ldlm files have distinctive names