* Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> > Then I really think this particular patch belongs in that other
> > patch set. Here, it makes very little sense, and it's on the end
> > anyway.
>
> It makes sense in that both percpu_32/64 are very
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Then I really think this particular patch belongs in that other patch
> set. Here, it makes very little sense, and it's on the end anyway.
It makes sense in that both percpu_32/64 are very small as a result of
earlier patches and so its justifiable to pu
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 11:31 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Well this is only the first patchset. The next one will unify this even
> more (and make percpu functions work consistent between the two arches)
> but it requires changes to the way the %gs register is used in
> x86_64. So we only do
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 13:10 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Form a single percpu.h from percpu_32.h and percpu_64.h. Both are now pretty
> > small so this is simply adding them together.
>
> I guess I just don't really see the point of moving the code
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 13:10 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Form a single percpu.h from percpu_32.h and percpu_64.h. Both are now pretty
> small so this is simply adding them together.
I guess I just don't really see the point of moving the code around like
this. Before, it would have been eas
Form a single percpu.h from percpu_32.h and percpu_64.h. Both are now pretty
small so this is simply adding them together.
Cc: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTE
Form a single percpu.h from percpu_32.h and percpu_64.h. Both are now pretty
small so this is simply adding them together.
Cc: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTE
Form a single percpu.h from percpu_32.h and percpu_64.h. Both are now pretty
small so this is simply adding them together.
Cc: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTE
* Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Form a single percpu.h from percpu_32.h and percpu_64.h. Both are now
> pretty small so this is simply adding them together.
lots of rejects - merging this was pretty icky. Hopefully i got it right
- see below.
Ingo
->
Form a single percpu.h from percpu_32.h and percpu_64.h. Both are now pretty
small so this is simply adding them together.
Cc: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-x86/percpu.h| 145
10 matches
Mail list logo
