Re: [PATCH 1/9] Unionfs: security convert lsm into a static interface fix

2007-10-27 Thread Erez Zadok
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:48:04PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > > Why? Are you concerned that the security policy may change after a module > > is loaded? > > No, it's a matter of proper layering. We generally don't want modules > like st

Re: [PATCH 1/9] Unionfs: security convert lsm into a static interface fix

2007-10-23 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:48:04PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > Why? Are you concerned that the security policy may change after a module > is loaded? No, it's a matter of proper layering. We generally don't want modules like stackabke filesystems to call directly into methods but rather use prope

Re: [PATCH 1/9] Unionfs: security convert lsm into a static interface fix

2007-10-22 Thread Erez Zadok
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:51:14PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ERROR: "security_inode_permission" [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "security_file_ioctl" [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko]

Re: [PATCH 1/9] Unionfs: security convert lsm into a static interface fix

2007-10-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:51:14PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ERROR: "security_inode_permission" [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko] undefined! > ERROR: "security_file_ioctl" [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko] undefined! > > Need these back. These should never used by module

[PATCH 1/9] Unionfs: security convert lsm into a static interface fix

2007-10-21 Thread Erez Zadok
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ERROR: "security_inode_permission" [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko] undefined! ERROR: "security_file_ioctl" [fs/unionfs/unionfs.ko] undefined! Need these back. Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Chris Wright <[EMA