On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> We cannot merge a kernel change which requires a userspace upgrade to get
> the X server working again.
Agreed.
>
> You can do it the other way: make the X server work by default (my patch)
> then, in your upgraded userspace, set /proc/sys/kernel/mmap
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:45:48 -0400 Eric Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 01:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:12:21 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I can't start the X server any more, but that's probably unrelated ;)
> > >
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:12:48 -0400 (EDT) James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My fix:
>
> This should work.
>
uh, OK, surprised.
Completer version:
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c~git-selinux-disable-mmap_min_addr-by-default
+++ a/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -112,9 +112,6 @@ int selinux
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 01:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:12:21 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I can't start the X server any more, but that's probably unrelated ;)
> >
> > > me hopelessly outnumbered>
>
> And the winner of the u-o-akpm-1-hour-of-his
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
Sorry, we should have discovered this before you.
> (Shouldn't this be in /proc/sys/vm?)
Probably.
> My fix:
This should work.
(We have some code to allow things like this to be added without needing
new policy, but it's too late for this case).
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:12:21 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't start the X server any more, but that's probably unrelated ;)
>
> me hopelessly outnumbered>
And the winner of the u-o-akpm-1-hour-of-his-life-back award (and the bonus
u-delayed-next-mm-by-a-day award!) is ..
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:38:22 -0700 Venki Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Auto-detect the presence of HPET on ICH5 or newer platforms and enable
> HPET for broadcast timer.
Hey. This works. The Vaio-of-doom is running tickless for the first time.
I can't start the X server any more, but
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 09:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I _think_ what's going on here is that your code will go and poke the
> hardware to enable the hpet even f the BIOS decided to hide its presence.
> Is that correct? If so, perhaps the changelog should mention this
> explicitly.
>
> > Appl
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:38:22 -0700 Venki Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Auto-detect the presence of HPET on ICH5 or newer platforms and enable
> HPET for broadcast timer. This gives a bigger upperlimit for tickless time
> tick and improves the power consumption in comparison to PIT as bro
Auto-detect the presence of HPET on ICH5 or newer platforms and enable
HPET for broadcast timer. This gives a bigger upperlimit for tickless time
tick and improves the power consumption in comparison to PIT as broadcast timer.
This patch:
Change the broadcast timer, if a timer with higher ratin
10 matches
Mail list logo