On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Stijn Devriendt wrote:
> This is one of the warts of the GPIO API, if you ask me (and probably
> others too).
> Using a resource without allocating it first is just asking for
> trouble. It's one of those
> things pinctl was designed to solve... I've been thinkin
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 27/01/13 14:19, Stijn Devriendt wrote:
>>> +Block GPIO
>>> +--
>>> +
>>> +The above described interface concentrates on handling single GPIOs.
>>> However,
>>> +in applications where it is critical to set several GPIOs at once, t
On 27/01/13 14:19, Stijn Devriendt wrote:
>> +Block GPIO
>> +--
>> +
>> +The above described interface concentrates on handling single GPIOs.
>> However,
>> +in applications where it is critical to set several GPIOs at once, this
>> +interface doesn't work well, e.g. bit-banging protocols
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> The recurring task of providing simultaneous access to GPIO lines (especially
> for bit banging protocols) needs an appropriate API.
>
> This patch adds a kernel internal "Block GPIO" API that enables simultaneous
> access to several GPIOs. T
The recurring task of providing simultaneous access to GPIO lines (especially
for bit banging protocols) needs an appropriate API.
This patch adds a kernel internal "Block GPIO" API that enables simultaneous
access to several GPIOs. This is done by abstracting GPIOs to an n-bit word:
Once requeste
5 matches
Mail list logo