On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 01:22 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > This sounds like an incompatible change to userspace API. What about
> > older glibc? What about user code that directly manipulates these bits
> > rather than going through libc, or uses a l
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Scott Wood wrote:
> This sounds like an incompatible change to userspace API. What about
> older glibc? What about user code that directly manipulates these bits
> rather than going through libc, or uses a libc other than glibc? Where
> is this API requirement documented?
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 16:52 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> From: Joseph Myers
>
> The e500 SPE floating-point emulation code clears existing exceptions
> (__FPU_FPSCR &= ~FP_EX_MASK;) before ORing in the exceptions from the
> emulated operation. However, these exception bits are the "sticky",
>
From: Joseph Myers
The e500 SPE floating-point emulation code clears existing exceptions
(__FPU_FPSCR &= ~FP_EX_MASK;) before ORing in the exceptions from the
emulated operation. However, these exception bits are the "sticky",
cumulative exception bits, and should only be cleared by the user
pro
4 matches
Mail list logo