On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 15:34, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 10:17 PM Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:33:55 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven
> > wrote:
> > > > This conflicts with "[PATCH] m68k: defconfig: Update defconfigs for
> > > > v6.12-rc1"[1]
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 10:17 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:33:55 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > > This conflicts with "[PATCH] m68k: defconfig: Update defconfigs for
> > > v6.12-rc1"[1]. Of course the proper way forward would be to add
> > > "default KUNIT_A
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:33:55 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> Hi all,
> > This conflicts with "[PATCH] m68k: defconfig: Update defconfigs for
> > v6.12-rc1"[1]. Of course the proper way forward would be to add
> > "default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS" to all tests that still lack it, so I can
> > just neve
Hi all,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 10:59 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 9:31 AM David Gow wrote:
> > From: Luis Felipe Hernandez
> >
> > This patch is a follow-up task from a discussion stemming from point 3
> > in a recent patch introducing the int_pow kunit test [1] and
>
Hi David,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 9:31 AM David Gow wrote:
> From: Luis Felipe Hernandez
>
> This patch is a follow-up task from a discussion stemming from point 3
> in a recent patch introducing the int_pow kunit test [1] and
> documentation regarding kunit test style and nomenclature [2].
>
>
From: Luis Felipe Hernandez
This patch is a follow-up task from a discussion stemming from point 3
in a recent patch introducing the int_pow kunit test [1] and
documentation regarding kunit test style and nomenclature [2].
Colocate all kunit test suites in lib/math/tests/ and
follow recommended
6 matches
Mail list logo
