On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Mika Westerberg
> wrote:
>
>> Sometimes it is useful to allow GPIO chips themselves to request GPIOs they
>> own through gpiolib API. One usecase is ACPI ASL code that should be able
>> to toggle GPIOs throu
On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 02:05:50 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:49:41AM +0800, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Mika Westerberg
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Sometimes it is useful to allow GPIO chips themselves to request GPIOs
> > > they
> > > own
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:49:41AM +0800, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Mika Westerberg
> wrote:
>
> > Sometimes it is useful to allow GPIO chips themselves to request GPIOs they
> > own through gpiolib API. One usecase is ACPI ASL code that should be able
> > to toggle
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Mika Westerberg
wrote:
> Sometimes it is useful to allow GPIO chips themselves to request GPIOs they
> own through gpiolib API. One usecase is ACPI ASL code that should be able
> to toggle GPIOs through GPIO operation regions.
>
> We can't really use gpio_request
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 02:47:58PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Sounds good. Only thing I'm not sure about is the fact that
> > __gpiod_request() releases the lock when it calls chip driver callbacks
> > (and takes it back of course). Is that acceptable practice to take the lock
> > outside
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:05:42 AM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:10:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 06:00:06 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > Sometimes it is useful to allow GPIO chips themselves to request GPIOs
> > > they
> > >
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:10:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 24, 2014 06:00:06 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Sometimes it is useful to allow GPIO chips themselves to request GPIOs they
> > own through gpiolib API. One usecase is ACPI ASL code that should be able
> > to t
On Monday, February 24, 2014 06:00:06 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Sometimes it is useful to allow GPIO chips themselves to request GPIOs they
> own through gpiolib API. One usecase is ACPI ASL code that should be able
> to toggle GPIOs through GPIO operation regions.
>
> We can't really use gpio_r
Sometimes it is useful to allow GPIO chips themselves to request GPIOs they
own through gpiolib API. One usecase is ACPI ASL code that should be able
to toggle GPIOs through GPIO operation regions.
We can't really use gpio_request() and its counterparts because it will pin
the module to the kernel
9 matches
Mail list logo