Re: [PATCH 1/6] MIPS: do not use __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 request

2017-06-26 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 06/23/2017 10:53 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > 3377e227af44 ("MIPS: Add 48-bit VA space (and 4-level page tables) for > 4K pages.") has added a new __GFP_REPEAT user but using this flag > doesn't really make any sense for order-0 request which is the case here > because PUD_

Re: [PATCH 1/6] MIPS: do not use __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 request

2017-06-23 Thread Ralf Baechle
Feel free to funnel this upstream with the rest of your series. Acked-by: Ralf Baechle Thanks, Ralf

[PATCH 1/6] MIPS: do not use __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 request

2017-06-23 Thread Michal Hocko
From: Michal Hocko 3377e227af44 ("MIPS: Add 48-bit VA space (and 4-level page tables) for 4K pages.") has added a new __GFP_REPEAT user but using this flag doesn't really make any sense for order-0 request which is the case here because PUD_ORDER is 0. __GFP_REPEAT has historically effect only on