Re: [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit

2012-07-30 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 09:16 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:40:53 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy > wrote: > > I've also amended the Kconfig text a tiny bit and dropped the defconfig > > changes - let's have them separately as a single patch at the end of the > > series. > > Wouldn

Re: [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit

2012-07-18 Thread Shmulik Ladkani
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:40:53 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > I've also amended the Kconfig text a tiny bit and dropped the defconfig > changes - let's have them separately as a single patch at the end of the > series. Wouldn't having the defconfig change as the last patch break things for those d

Re: [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit

2012-07-18 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:06 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > Introduce 'ubi->bad_peb_limit', which specifies an upper limit of PEBs > ubi expects to go bad. > Currently, it is initialized to a fixed percentage of total PEBs in the > ubi device (configurable via CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT). > > The 'b

Re: [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit

2012-07-18 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:06 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > Introduce 'ubi->bad_peb_limit', which specifies an upper limit of PEBs > ubi expects to go bad. > Currently, it is initialized to a fixed percentage of total PEBs in the > ubi device (configurable via CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT). > > The 'b