Hi,
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:38:48 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:28:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Currently if a sample was filtered by command line option, it just
>> dropped. But this affects final output in that the percentage can be
>> different since the filtered en
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:21:00 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:28:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Currently if a sample was filtered by command line option, it just
>> dropped. But this affects final output in that the percentage can be
>> different since the filtered entries
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:28:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Currently if a sample was filtered by command line option, it just
> dropped. But this affects final output in that the percentage can be
> different since the filtered entries were not included to the total.
>
> But user might want
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:28:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Currently if a sample was filtered by command line option, it just
> dropped. But this affects final output in that the percentage can be
> different since the filtered entries were not included to the total.
>
> But user might want
Currently if a sample was filtered by command line option, it just
dropped. But this affects final output in that the percentage can be
different since the filtered entries were not included to the total.
But user might want to see the original percentages when filter
applied so change the behavi
Currently if a sample was filtered by command line option, it just
dropped. But this affects final output in that the percentage can be
different since the filtered entries were not included to the total.
But user might want to see the original percentages when filter
applied so change the behavi
6 matches
Mail list logo