Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Divorce the perf code from oprofile helpers

Hi Marc, On 2021/4/15 18:42, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:59:26 +0100, > Keqian Zhu wrote: >> >> Hi Marc, >> >> On 2021/4/14 21:44, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> KVM/arm64 is the sole user of perf_num_counters(), and really >>> could do without it. Stop using the obsolete API by relying

Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Divorce the perf code from oprofile helpers

Hi Marc, On 2021/4/14 21:44, Marc Zyngier wrote: > KVM/arm64 is the sole user of perf_num_counters(), and really > could do without it. Stop using the obsolete API by relying on > the existing probing code. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c | 7 +-- > arch/ar

[PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Divorce the perf code from oprofile helpers

KVM/arm64 is the sole user of perf_num_counters(), and really could do without it. Stop using the obsolete API by relying on the existing probing code. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c | 7 +-- arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 2 +- include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 4 3 f