Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: core: Add component pin control functions

2016-11-29 Thread Charles Keepax
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:32:26PM +, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > It's often the case that a codec driver will need to control its > own pins. However, if a name_prefix has been applied to this codec it > must be included in the name passed to any of the snd_soc_dapm_x_pin() > functions. > > T

[PATCH 1/5] ASoC: core: Add component pin control functions

2016-11-28 Thread Richard Fitzgerald
It's often the case that a codec driver will need to control its own pins. However, if a name_prefix has been applied to this codec it must be included in the name passed to any of the snd_soc_dapm_x_pin() functions. The behaviour of the existing pin control functions is reasonable, since you may