Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2017-01-30 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:13:58 +0100 Pavel Machek escreveu: > Hi! > > > On 16.01.2017 12:10, Sean Young wrote: > > > > > >Have you had a chance to test the ir-rx51 changes? > > > > > >Thanks > > >Sean > > > > > > > Still no, and afaik there are issues booting n900 with current kernel. Will >

Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2017-01-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > On 16.01.2017 12:10, Sean Young wrote: > > > >Have you had a chance to test the ir-rx51 changes? > > > >Thanks > >Sean > > > > Still no, and afaik there are issues booting n900 with current kernel. Will > try to find time over the weekend. v4.10-rc3 (?) works for me on n900. Do you want a

Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2017-01-16 Thread Ivaylo Dimitrov
Hi On 16.01.2017 12:10, Sean Young wrote: Have you had a chance to test the ir-rx51 changes? Thanks Sean Still no, and afaik there are issues booting n900 with current kernel. Will try to find time over the weekend. Ivo

Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2017-01-16 Thread Sean Young
Hi Ivo, On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 03:50:42PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > On 30.12.2016 15:30, Sean Young wrote: > > > >On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:07:52PM +, Sean Young wrote: > >>Hi Ivo,, > >> > >>On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:30:01PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > >>>On 20.12.2016 19:50, Sean

Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2016-12-30 Thread Sean Young
Hi Ivo, On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 03:50:42PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > On 30.12.2016 15:30, Sean Young wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:07:52PM +, Sean Young wrote: > >Speaking of which, if you would please test this, that would be great. My > >N900 died many years ago. > > Will do, b

Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2016-12-30 Thread Ivaylo Dimitrov
On 30.12.2016 15:30, Sean Young wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:07:52PM +, Sean Young wrote: Hi Ivo,, On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:30:01PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: On 20.12.2016 19:50, Sean Young wrote: This driver was written using lirc since rc-core did not support transmitter-o

Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2016-12-30 Thread Sean Young
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:07:52PM +, Sean Young wrote: > Hi Ivo,, > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:30:01PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > > On 20.12.2016 19:50, Sean Young wrote: > > >This driver was written using lirc since rc-core did not support > > >transmitter-only hardware at that time.

Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2016-12-30 Thread Sean Young
Hi Ivo,, On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:30:01PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > On 20.12.2016 19:50, Sean Young wrote: > >This driver was written using lirc since rc-core did not support > >transmitter-only hardware at that time. Now that it does, port > >this driver. > > > >Compile tested only. > > >

Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2016-12-30 Thread Ivaylo Dimitrov
Hi, On 20.12.2016 19:50, Sean Young wrote: This driver was written using lirc since rc-core did not support transmitter-only hardware at that time. Now that it does, port this driver. Compile tested only. I guess after that change, there will be no more /dev/lircN device, right? Neither wil

[PATCH 1/5] [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core

2016-12-20 Thread Sean Young
This driver was written using lirc since rc-core did not support transmitter-only hardware at that time. Now that it does, port this driver. Compile tested only. Signed-off-by: Sean Young Cc: Timo Kokkonen Cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c | 8 +- drivers/m