On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:42 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:18:43PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:13 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:57:15PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:50 PM Jason
On Mon 10-12-18 11:36:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Just a bit of paranoia, since if we start pushing this deep into
> callchains it's hard to spot all places where an mmu notifier
> implementation might fail when it's not allowed to.
>
> Inspired by some confusion we had discussing i915 mmu notifier
Patches #1 and #3 are Reviewed-by: Christian König
Patch #2 is Acked-by: Christian König because
I can't judge if adding the counter in the thread structure is actually
a good idea.
In patch #4 I honestly don't understand at all how this stuff works, so
no-comment from my side on this.
Chr
Just a bit of paranoia, since if we start pushing this deep into
callchains it's hard to spot all places where an mmu notifier
implementation might fail when it's not allowed to.
Inspired by some confusion we had discussing i915 mmu notifiers and
whether we could use the newly-introduced return va
4 matches
Mail list logo
