Quoting Linus Walleij (2018-10-10 05:05:18)
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 6:32 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> >
> > Let's leave around one unsigned int in the gpio_irq_chip struct for the
> > single parent irq case and repoint the 'parents' array at it. This way
> > code is left mostly intact to setup par
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 6:32 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> gpiochip_set_cascaded_irqchip() is passed 'parent_irq' as an argument
> and then the address of that argument is assigned to the gpio chips
> gpio_irq_chip 'parents' pointer shortly thereafter. This can't ever
> work, because we've just assigne
Quoting kbuild test robot (2018-10-08 21:56:25)
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[...]
>net/mac80211/sta_info.h:588: warning: Function parameter or member
> 'tx_stats.packets' not described in 'sta_info'
>net/mac80211/sta_info.h:588: warning: Function par
Hi Stephen,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on gpio/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.19-rc7 next-20181008]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/lin
gpiochip_set_cascaded_irqchip() is passed 'parent_irq' as an argument
and then the address of that argument is assigned to the gpio chips
gpio_irq_chip 'parents' pointer shortly thereafter. This can't ever
work, because we've just assigned some stack address to a pointer that
we plan to dereference
5 matches
Mail list logo
