On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 01:36 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, May 02, 2013 05:11:27 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 14:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
:
> > >
> > > +static inline bool device_supports_offline(struct device *dev)
> >
On Thursday, May 02, 2013 05:11:27 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 14:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > In some cases, graceful hot-removal of devices is not possible,
> > although in principle the devices in question support hotplug.
> > For exam
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 14:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> In some cases, graceful hot-removal of devices is not possible,
> although in principle the devices in question support hotplug.
> For example, that may happen for the last CPU in the system or
> for memory
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:27:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> In some cases, graceful hot-removal of devices is not possible,
> although in principle the devices in question support hotplug.
> For example, that may happen for the last CPU in the system or
> for
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
In some cases, graceful hot-removal of devices is not possible,
although in principle the devices in question support hotplug.
For example, that may happen for the last CPU in the system or
for memory modules holding kernel memory.
In those cases it is nice to be able to
5 matches
Mail list logo
